Truly A Trick or Treat: Real Estate Search Results


Not all listings are created equal ~ Sami Inkinen, truly a real estate media site salesman

trulia trick or treat

Do your listings (and buyers) get a Trick or Treat in search results on a real estate media site like Trulia?  Should a buyer doing a search see the best match listings first or the “featured” listings someone paid to get to the head of the line?

Sami Inkinen, Trulia COO, recently cooed:

Can you game the Trulia search results ranking?” The answer is simple: Yes – the more interesting you make your listings to consumers, the more exposure and home buyer inquiries your listings will get.

…Essentially, the cream rises to the top and the least comprehensive listings are most likely to be found on the bottom.

Sounds like a sweet treat for buyers, Sami.  But is this tru? I call Bullshit!

Apparently, the best way to game real estate search, and have your listings rise to the top of search results, is to PAY for a featured listingFeatured listings are listed first and get more views (according to Trulia).

featured lisitngs

Real estate professionals know that interesting comprehensive creamy listings do not get into the club ahead of  dollar hustling featured listings. Featured listings get to the front of the velvet line by slipping the line keepers a sawbuck.  (unlike in real life where the best looking jump the line)

I did a little test on Trulia (Trulia means trust).  Indeed, a featured listing with no photo ranked ahead of a non-featured listing with photos.   Treat!  Money raises your listing to the top. Not your great copywriting or creamy photos.

rise

BUT….what about the non-featured cream of the crop ranking?

Does the “Cream” Rise to The Top on Trulia for Non-Featured Listings?

According to Sami:

We track consumer behavior religiously on our site and know what type of listings they gravitate towards in each search (hint: they like more photos!). To meet their needs, the initial search results (aka “the default ranking”) that consumers see before any custom sorting are ranked to surface the best content first. (emphasis added)

So, Sami, why does this  non-featured listing with no address, and only 4 photos, rank ahead of other non-featured listings, with lower prices, and one with 9 photos?

BTW Sami, NO ONE sees the great content of a listing until they click “view details”. So, how does my hidden, property description get people to click?

I searched condos $430,000 – $500,000 (any beds or baths) and Trulia gave me this “Best Match” result— a higher priced condo, with no address, outranked lower priced condos, even those with more photos.  Cream rising to the top?  More like a hot load of …..

Trick?

best results1

Is it the number of photos Sami, as you hinted?  Well, why was this one, with the most photos (9), listed almost at the bottom of this search result? Oh yeah, it had a lower price too.

botton

Maybe it was the awesome description of the listing with no address that ranked it so high above the others.  You Trulians really know how to rank listings buyers gravitate toward.  Amazing.

See full Trick or Treat results page here. (link)

So, jump the line at Trulia and pay for featured listings and beat out those folks who have non-featured listings.  Besides, your non-featured listing may get a rotten apple Best Match ranking against other non-featured listings.

See Trulia Trick or Treat Play plans here.  Go for the $79 per month deal to get your contact info on the search page, dizzying virtual tours and a dedicated account manager (really? Is that a live person or a recording?)–the other plans don’t give you any of that good candy.

FTC Disclosure:

I was not given any Trulia IOU (they run lean),  corporate swag or Halloween treats to promote their highly priced ranked featured listings or their crappy brilliant creamy listing algorithm.

Related Post:

Are Featured Listings Worth the Price of Admission?

preview from this post:

A featured home has no intrinsic or added value to a buyer. None, nada, zip. I don’t know who came up with the word “featured” (maybe that guy who created “certified pre-owned automobiles” to replace “used cars”), but it’s more than a tad misleading, dontcha think? Featured stuff normally involves some value, some reason to pay your money– This movie features Angelina Jolie like you’ve never seen her before. But a featured listing? Featured for what? Because someone paid to jump the ticket line? That’s NOT value to the buyer.

Technorati Tags: , ,

Share This Post
  • Joseph, you're one-of-a-kind. CHEERS;-))
  • Right back at 'ya, Ken.
  • You mean it's surprising that people who pay money go to the front of the line? I thought that was the whole idea. What pay a nickle if I'm going to fall behind someone who is feature-rich or a good copywriter with lots of photos.

    Trulia isn't the only one that ranks listings by price. My own humble MLS (MRIS) has it's own IDX (homesdatabase) and it always ranks by highest price at the top (meaning the top of your search criteria).

    I dunno, Joe. To me this falls under: "So, what else is new?"
  • Exactly! But Sami says Trulia ranks listings by "quality" (implying this applies to the unwashed, unfeatured mass of listings). According to slingin' Sami:

    "...the initial search results (aka "the default ranking") that consumers see before any custom sorting are ranked to surface the best content first..... "Essentially, the cream rises to the top and the least comprehensive listings are most likely to be found on the bottom." (link to post here: http://tinyurl.com/yj8q2a2

    But my test showed this NOT to be the case for non-featured listings. The crap rose to the top, not the cream.

    BTW, Trulia's listings in my search were not listed by highest price:
    449, 475, 450, 455, 459, 449

    http://www.trulia.com/for_sale/Staten_Island,NY...
  • jasonsandquist
    Also, aren't those undisclosed address listings the ones that RealtyTrac pumps in? You know that one company that ones you to fork over $40 a month for basic information that could be found on the counties website.
  • No, these came from listings.point2. RealtyTrac sends foreclosures which were at the end of the search results, despite their somewhat more detailed description.

    Methinks Sami, in his post, is trying to get agents to beef up their listings descriptions with the promise that Trulia will rank them higher on Trulia when in fact, even crappy featured listings will ALWAYS rank higher than any kick ass non-featured listing.

    I think Trulia just wants agents to help feed Trulia's SEO beast to continue to outrank agent's websites on Google. Just my opinion.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Blog Widget by LinkWithin