The Best Price To Sell a House is Not Round


A University of Florida marketing professors’ study of buyer behavior indicated that you will likely net more money if you price a home at a precise amount– $498,550 (or 501,350) vs. a round number like $500,000. Apparently, the brain discounts the value more when it’s a round number and discounts to another round number.

The experiment went like this:

There were three scenarios involving different retail prices: one group of buyers was given a price of $5,000, another was given a price of $4,988, and the third was told $5,012. When all the buyers were asked to estimate the wholesale price, those with the $5,000 price tag in their head guessed much lower than those contemplating the more precise retail prices. That is, they moved farther away from the mental anchor. What is more, those who started with the round number as their mental anchor were much more likely to guess a wholesale price that was also in round numbers. The scientists ran this experiment again and again with different scenarios and always got the same result. (emphasis added)

Why?

According to the reseachers:

….[P]eople appear to create mental measuring sticks that run in increments away from any opening bid, and the size of the increments depends on the opening bid. That is, if we see a $20 toaster, we might wonder whether it is worth $19 or $18 or $21; we are thinking in round numbers. But if the starting point is $19.95, the mental measuring stick would look different. We might still think it is wrongly priced, but in our minds we are thinking about nickels and dimes instead of dollars, so a fair comeback might be $19.75 or $19.50.

Has anyone had an experience to corroborate this theory?

Source: Scientific American. (h/t Neurosciencemarketing)

Share This Post
  • I think this pricing tactic works for all products and services, not just real estate.
  • 9-5-08 listed @ 975,000 after spring mkt @ 999
    10-24 ~reduced to 925
    11-09 ~1 offer 105k less
    11-16 ~reduced to 895
    no change in the bid no more action on the listing....
    Now what do I do...sellers tell me they are "bleeding"
  • I wonder if the search behavior is different between buyers and their brokers?

    When I search, I set the maximum well above what I'd want to pay (say $600K), so I don't miss these straddlers.

    Someone has surely studied search behavior in housing.
  • DeborahMadey
    I am a fan of the price at 500K vs. 499K for the reason of meeting the search criteria of buyers in the 475-500K, and the buyers looking for 500-525K. I do not know of any research on this. From experience, I support greater market exposure and this increased exposure leads to securing the highest and best contract.
  • I see your point, Brad. Hmm.... sounds logical, which gives me pause to question it :) Any research on this?

    BUT, does the premise still hold true that the house priced at $499,650 will net a higher sales price than one priced at $500,000?
  • Of course, Brad is right... and the marketing geniuses don't sell real estate.

    There is nothing more ridiculous than those silly prices some agents use. Srsly.
  • I understand the logic and psychology of why this works, but I also think you must factor in the SEARCH element. How many websites or real estate search tools offer the ability to search in $5,000 increments (very few). For those that do offer the smaller increments, how many actually use them (I doubt many).

    I contend that you will get MORE viewers from a web search if you price on the whole number in $25,000 increments. In your example of $498,550, I argue that $500,000 would be better for marketing because it would reach a wider audience. Not only would you get those searching from $450,000 to $500,000, but you'd also capture those searching from $500,000 to $550,000. Otherwise, you'd miss the entire search populous who began their home search at $500,000 (by a small $1,450). I bet the same search parameters are true for agents using the local MLS. Almost everyone searches in $25,000 increments and I'd hate to miss the bottom-end of a search criteria, just to play mind games with a potential purchaser. Give me the most eyeballs please!
  • I think that more analytical people will round UP from $5.99 to $6.00, at least that is what I do. But I know from experience that when my husband buys wine for $8.99 (and gets 3 because it's such a good deal) he'll later tell me he "spent less than $25" for the 3 of them, because he remembers the $8 part! (Then I throw cold water on his party when I dig the receipt out of the trash and show him that it was really $29.06 after paying the tax.)

    With homes, I usually recommend pricing under any major price-range cutoff points (in $25K or $50K increments). I don't really see much difference in pricing at $455K, $467K, or $474K because they would land on the same list of $450K - $475K priced homes.
  • This has been known for a long time among marketers. Your brain will always see the first number, so $39.95 will seem more like $30 than the $40 it is.

    Anyone, good tip for using this in real-estate too!
  • I can't corroborate this theory, but I did just have a Feng Shui stager recommend a price of $159,821 as opposed to my $159,900 price. Seems the digits add up to 8, a magic number.
    No showings yet.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Blog Widget by LinkWithin