Real Estate Myths or What I Did on My Summer Vacation


nar-internet-buyers-search-homes.gif

In the Gospel according to NAR, 77% of buyers use the internet to search for homes. This stat has become sacred dogma, incessantly chanted by MSM and the bloggerati. It provides the philosophical foundation for putting your listings on all manner of websites. It requires you do penance to upgrade to the revered “featured listing”. To question this stat would be a blasphemy akin to questioning the earth’s roundness (actually, the earth is an oblate spheroid, but I digress.)

As you may or may not know, the sacred stat was created when 7,800 of 145,000 selected buyers answered a NAR questionnaire. Having never seen the question, I am curious to read how it was framed. Years of legal wrangling has taught me how the framing of a question can almost guarantee a desired answer. Now, I am not suggesting that NAR did anything sinister, but I’d like to see the question, and its context. Forget for a moment that less than 5.5% of the buyers responded—I understand in the statistician’s number crunching church, this may be enough to sanctify the stat— but still, that’s a lot of empty pews. I too was a believer until someone made me question my faith– the man (and woman) on the street we questioned during the Blog Tour.

Based on our Blog Tour research, by no means scientific, we realized the stat, even if true, does not provide a guiding marketing principle . For one thing, it does not identify WHEN or WHERE consumers search online. We think the “When” is important because if it’s lower on the list of search activities, real estate agents ought to be spending more energy and resources reaching the consumer before they hit the keyboard. We think the “Where” is important because it would allow for the efficient allocation of resources online (Oh, oh, did I say “efficient allocation of resources”? Quick, pass me the economist antidote.)

BLOG TOUR RESEARCH RESULTS

1. The Internet is the Last Resort for Home Search

First, put down those pointy stakes and douse that fire.

We asked: How did you find your home? Here is the heresy we heard: Most buyers DID NOT BEGIN their search for homes online. It may be on the search list, but it is not first, second or possibly, even third. The Internet is not a starting point for most home buyers. Based on our findings, the vast majority of real estate buyers (and renters) start searching elsewhere. They start OFFLINE. They tell family and friends (even doormen) that they are in the market and ask for advice and referrals— WOM (word of mouth) is alive and well in real estate. Before picking up a mouse, they drive around the neighborhoods they are interested in (they usually know the neighborhoods they want to live in by the same old fashioned means– family, friends, personal experience in the neighborhood). They look at lawn signs and visit open houses. They’ll look in the local paper– gasp! (yes, they look, but they do not usually call— that’s why print is viewed as having a low ROI– how do you measure a look at a print ad– it’s not like a click) They’ll even walk into a storefront brokerage.

Only AFTER offline methods fail, or wanting to expand their search, do they search the internet. The Internet is, we believe, the last resort. Why? Because most consumers do not have a clue where or how to “effectively” search for homes on the internet. They know how to email and check stock quotes but most are “REC” –real estate challenged. It is easier for them to find porn than a penthouse on Park.

Tip: Get consumers before they get to their keyboards. Do not give up on traditional methods, just do them better than your competition— so when buyers and sellers get to their computer, they type in your brand name in the Internet box.

2. Google is God (of the Internet home search, that is)

For most buyers, Google’s ubiquitous white box is the Internet.

google-search-real-estate.gif

Buyers do not start a home search visiting real estate listing sites, real estate search engines, or real estate broker sites to search for houses. They overwhelming start on Google and where that takes them they don’t know. You’d be surprised what they type in.

3. WHO THE HELLO IS Z-LLOW?

The reason buyers do not visit real estate listing sites, search engines or broker websites is simple. They don’t know they exist. Yes, many have heard of Realtor.com but many more have not, especially the youth. Most have never used the online websites we all ASSUME they use. Most have never even heard of them.

Even in its hometown of Seattle, Z-llow is unknown to most people — one woman thought it was a dance and demonstrated it for us. No one knew Redfin– it may as well be an exotic fish for your aquarium. Why? We believe the reason is online real estate web sites do an inadequate job of advertising and marketing their brands offline. They think because they solely exist online, that is solely where they should market. It may be a fatal marketing mistake. When I asked Glenn Kelman why he did not advertise on a huge brick wall across from his building, where streams of people walked every day, he said he saw no benefit in it. Glenn, more people will pass that wall than will stumble upon your website. (And those people will buy or sell a house without you.) The wall you ignore is a pointer to your website, no less than a Google keyword.

The message: Since the Internet search begins with Google (Yahoo and MSN), broker and agent resources should be allocated to SEO and “market keyword rich” content, whether by purchase or otherwise, to drive traffic to your branded website or blog. Become a destination site by providing local and hyper-local content. Own the white box by being seen outside it.

LEARN FROM THE CAVEMAN: The Writing is on the Wall

offline-ads.gif

In our opinion, online listing sites who do not advertise and market offline increase their likelihood of failure. (A little gecko told us that.)

As we traveled the highways of America, we passed many a billboard advertising real estate. They were mostly local builders and FSBO websites. Some franchises did advertise this way— notably RE/MAX. These guys get it. They understand that traditional media should be used to increase brand awareness and drive traffic to their websites.

Brand, baby, brand. Heck, even a caveman knows where to shop for car insurance online. Where are the signs and commercials for Trulia, Z-llow, and Redfin? (At least Trulia had big signs outside their office— Z-llow has it’s offices on the 30th floor (and their marketing heads in the clouds— consumers can’t see up you there, Rich).

In case you don’t know it tech boys and girls, the online user lives offline– they walk the street, eat at sidewalk cafes and sip overpriced coffee (others go to Waffle House). That’s where they talk real estate. If Z-llow believes in the “conversation” at Z-llow.com, why are they not in front of the consumer where they are actually having these conversations? It’s unz-llowable! In order to reach the consumer in their native habitat, you MUST advertise and market offline. Heck, we’d only charge you a mil for that advice. (wait a minute, we just told them for free– dang!)

As online real estate sites increase (as Trulia’s Pete Flint acknowledged during our interview with him), you miss a golden opportunity to stand out from the crowd by not being outside—reaching offline eyeballs.

If buyers don’t know your name, how will they type it in the Google Box? They won’t. They can’t. You are then at the mercy of a keyword. Good luck.

Oh yeah, almost forgot, the only real estate website almost everyone knows is…. virtual drumroll, please…. Craigslist. Some are not sure if Craig is a real person but they surely know the site and use it. His success is due to offline word of mouth.

Further Illumination:

Robert Scoble (gotta love Robert– I do) talks about getting noticed outside the internet (among other things) in order to get noticed by the Influencers on the internet. Click here.  (h/t Anthony Barba)

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , ,

Share This Post
  • Thanks guys - I've had a gut suspicion this has been the case all along.
  • There is no question that the internet and all of its permutations is an extremly useful tool in the sale of real estate. One must remember that it is a tool, like a cellphone or late model automobile. Before we can apply the tool to the job, we must first have a job. That job invariably comes to us by searching out those people that wish to buy or sell real estate (prospecting), or by inviting those same people to work with us (advertising). If we prospect and advertise well, we will find people that need our services, and then can use the tools at our disposal and/or direct our customers to use our tools. The WWW and the hype of biased statistics such as the 77% search stat (the NAR is not the only culprit here) has encouraged the average real estate professional to become lazy and passive. Prospect much, and focus some advertiseg efforts off line.
  • The best post of the year! Very well done!
  • Thanks Kris.

    Maybe we'll be nominated for a doggie medal :)
  • A hat tip to Larry Cragun (spiderman)-- we learned he promotes his blog with brochures distributed offline where consumers pick them up and then go to their keyboards to type in his blog address.
  • In NAR's defense, I attended a Realtor.com Expo (Sales Opportunity) where the speaker, Max Pigman brought up the 77% statistic. He immediately qualified that this only meant that the buyer will go to the net at one point or another during the process. He said it was up to the agent to be in the right place at the right time when those buyers go online.

    Since a Realtor can establish a basic presence on Realtor.com at no additional charge, it makes sense for them to do so. I have my doubts as to the effectiveness of their advanced products though. I'd rather spend it on populating search results for Google.

    If I were a listing agent, I'd register every address in my prospect farm as a URL. 123MainSt, 124MainSt, 125... Then I'd build a web page for every one of them. I'd go out and take a picture of the house, I'd write some of my own remarks about. I'd link to the county's public property records for the property, and I'd link every page back to a blog about the neighborhood. At $10.00 per domain name, 500 homes would cost $5,000 a year (less if you market condos). You could spend a lot more than that with Realtor.com, or one of those useless property for sale magazines. Even if that is to rich, you could build subdomain pages for each property (123mainst.sellsius.com) and get a similar effect. I'd probably buy at least one URL that reflects that neighborhood, and place the the blog their, and the subdomains below it.
  • Excellent Post. I deliver 2000 flyers a week to my local farm in an effort to drive traffic to my website and blog, this just made me feel better about doing it.
  • Excellent advice Todd
    Steven-- what are your results?
  • As I read disagreeing with your post and the questioning of the Stat, I realized that we do a lot of offline stuff. After I write a blog that would be helpful to FSBO's we print it off with Letter head that looks exactly the same as our blog header. We mail it out with our blog address all over it and at the end of the article put, "this was written on May 15th, visit www.EdynBlog.com for updated info and tips."

    We are starting to do the thing that Todd suggested but not to that extreme yet. We have 9 different blogsites for local communities in and around the Madison area. Example-www.MononaAreaRealEstate.com or www.VeronaAreaRealEstate.com

    On a few of the sites we are starting to add pages that have sub-division info or condo development info. Todd's suggestion is an idea, that I could run with but I'm sure my partner will question about when will I have time for that also.

    oh by the way, I phone prospect daily. I pick up the phone and call how ever many expireds there are and at least five FSBO's a day. If nothing else, I'm getting the word out about our blog and I'm damn proud of our blog.
  • It all depends on your local market. Every market has "a real estate thing" that just is the nexus of real estate advertising. The Sunday Real Estate suppliment in the Hartford Courant for example is pretty much the place to advertise open homes for example. (In my area of course)

    I do think that we're moving more and more to an online model for home search. In 1997 Amazon and eBay were a big ??? to 99%+ people, now they are household names.

    We're all ahead of the curve on the re.net. It's a good thing and a bad thing.
  • We know (because we asked) that a well known blogger still gets all business using the telephone. Old school is still school.
  • There is no question that internet marketing is where most savvy agents are spending their money. A blog is actually one of the most powerful tools for capturing a good client in your local market. All other means of advertising should include your website and blog if you have one. Creating a powerful site that is highly indexed by google does go a long way.
  • So Far 4 weeks into flyer campain and hits are up 100%, but that isn't saying much because my hits were way to low.
  • Real estate is local - every area of the US will probably provide you with different results to "the question" (regardless of how it's phrased). Also, the age range of those asked the question will likely affect results as well... who knows what the age breakdown was of those who answered that question posed by the NAR?

    Also, some individuals (& companies) ask themselves "what kind of customer/client do I want to work with" and develop their marketing around the answer to that.
  • Agreed Leanne. You don't market to rental minded youth as you to do to seniors or second home buyers. But ALL types of buyers spend time offline and a marketing campaign confined to the internet will not reach them during their offline time. We believe we will see more 360 degree marketing campaigns, at least from those companies getting millions of dollars in funding.
  • It's good to have some web presence so if your name is googled, you at least exist. However, this continual pressure for each agent to maintain a high profile web presence is overrated.

    A beginning agent is best advised to spend their time volunteering at their kids school events, coaching, stuffing envelopes, working on an arts auction, volunteering at the local hospital, getting involved in their local political caucus, hosting a neighborhood potluck, that sort of thing.

    Being involved in the community and meeting new people is the best thing you can do.

    As you point out, offline, people live their lives offline. If you are thinking of buying or selling a house, folks may tend to think about that nice person they met at the neighborhood community meeting first and to turn to them for assistance before they go to some anonymous website.

    If they haven't met that nice person yet, then the buyer or seller may remember seeing an ad or billboard for a local agency or search online for a national brand.

    Even though I spend a lot of time online, I still do most of my business face-to-face.
  • Marlow, yours is the voice of experience. It is easy to think because the internet is free (or almost free) and so far reaching, it means face-to-face connections can be curtailed--not so. Real estate is a relationship business and the best relationships come in the flesh. The balance must be struck.
  • I didn't mean to imply that any company should focus ALL their marketing dollars solely on online campaigns... that would be tantamount to putting "all the eggs in one basket" so-to-speak and that's not a good idea. Regardless of the demographic a company chooses to focus on, they should develop a marketing campaign that will include places likely to be frequented by those that fit the demographic.
  • Yes, I know, Leanne. I was just repeating myself in agreement with you :)
  • I tend to agree with some of what you're saying but not 100%. I live and work around the Silicon Valley where most people do use the net for everything. Think home of Craigslist. Print, WOM, belly-to-belly reinforce what you are doing online. We just inclued a small card with out monthly mailing to tell everyone about our Blog. I will be interested in looking at the stats in about a week to see if there's a bump. As for business coming in from the blog? Ha, after 9 months (just like gestation) I have only received on call due to my internet presence. We try to work Google and do all of the right things, but as I said, you must reinforce your name for that recognition.
  • Lenore,

    Yes. Certainly each market has its nuances and reaching that balance between online & offline marketing can take some experimenting. But we found that offline marketing which builds brand awareness and drives traffic to your online website is very likely to yield better results than strictly an online blitz. With all the talk of traditional advertising loosing ground to online, we questioned the premise and found traditional methods are not yet dead. But as you say, you have to know your market, you have to try different approaches and be willing to experiment.

    Larry Cragun tells us he has had good success with his blog "brochures".
  • Thanks for this nice article! Seems more and more like we are heading toward an online-all-the-time networking community, but I agree that we still need to incorporate traditional methods. Just because the technology exists doesn’t mean everyone is going to use it. Granted, each generation will be more Web-savvy than the last, but until today’s 10-15 year olds – the generation that’s growing up relying on the internet for seemingly all information – reach retirement age, I don’t think we need to abandon traditional methods at all. Even when everyone is using the internet for real estate scouting, there is something undeniably refreshing about unfolding a crisp newspaper or browsing a tangible magazine – or even coming across a billboard on the highway – for any type of listing. So let’s keep incorporating the new with the old to effectively reach buyers.
  • Hi, it's David from Zillow.com -

    Nice post guys (but there seems to be a problem with the "i" key on your keyboard) ;-)

    Agreed that word of mouth is CRITICAL to success in real estate - and that online advertising is only one part of a good marketing strategy. For example and as far as I know, Russel Shaw still spends the bulk of his ad budget on TV advertising. The internet is an emerging marketing venue - but emerging none the less.

    At Zillow we know that we've just begun to get the word out and we're happy with our results so far. Zillow has invested most of its marketing budget in developing the site features and does almost no advertising - word of mouth, PR and SEO account for our site's new visitors.

    You're right - even though around 4M people visit Zillow each month we have lots of room to grow. Initiatives like broker feeds and our upcoming mortgage product are the types of big bets that will continue to drive word of mouth around the Zillow brand. About half of Zillow visitors heard about the site from a friend. Something I learned in my time at Amazon.com is that when it comes to building internet brands; slow and steady wins the race. What is important is that you build a site that people talk about and then you keep innovating. And as Lenore points out, there are markets where nearly every single active buyer is already online; mainly the large MSA's on the SE and W coasts.

    You should also realize that part of the allure of online advertising today is exactly that it is still a "blue ocean." Blogging is a great example of this - for all the buzz about real estate blogging, there are still relatively few real estate pro's who have blogged their first post and so those that do easily dominate google. As with real estate blogging, now is exactly the time to embrace and master online advertising. As a Realtor, you should obviously continue to market yourself and your listings off-line but there's a good chance that you'll get more bang for your buck online - because your competitors aren't there yet.
  • Hi David

    We left out the "i" to test how good your alert system is-- there is no hiding from you :)

    While I agree with your comment, I suspect slow and steady on the internet eats up the dollar bills. Now, when you've got millions, like the Z machine, you can stay in the online game a long time...but if you don't, you have to get the online brand out into the offline world. I gave the Redfin example to show how they were missing hundreds of people a day, every day. While they linger, other discounters will jump in and the first one who makes a strong offline push will capture market and mind share-- while Glenn hangs with the Slowskies.

    If we worked for Zillow we would be sprinting the brand offline (you should hear some of our ideas)---we learned a lot from the Blog Tour and found specific examples of what we are talking about-- where online players vaulted their brand over others by offline tactics. The online space is crowded and getting more so-- Z's Q&A; will be replicated tenfold before you turn around-- you really don't have much time in the online space before your competitors do it a little better.

    >there’s a good chance that you’ll get more bang for your buck online - because your competitors aren’t there yet.

    Disagree with you here. Big time. We have the evidence that's not the case at all.
  • Guys, this is just a top notch nugget of information that confirms my own beliefs.
  • Having spent so much time online, we forgot how people do things offline and had to check some assumptions about their online habits. When we hit the road, we got a dose of reality. We are not suggesting that online marketing is a waste-- by no means-- it is essential...but do not neglect your brand offline. Yes, online is the future, but you still have to make money in the present.
  • The post was great - the comments fabulous! We've been on the web with our own branded website since 1995 (yes, we used the 'free' AOL web stuff they had a decade ago). Anyway, we are on the web, and 80% of our business comes from people who have thoroughly visited our website and our blog. But the key component? We drove 90% of those leads to our website via other methods. This makes for a very highly efficient website and nope, it's not overly pretty or fancy and we've had various designers call us and tell us just how well they can improve the website. We really aren't interested, our clients and leads really like the website - they've helped us design it themselves (it's an ongoing process).

    The other methods? 1) Our monthly snail mail newsletter 2) Our monthly snail mail postcard 3) opt-in email broadcasts and 4) Select print marketing pointing directly to a web address.

    We have always successfully used direct mail and always will. It's interesting to see the agents that spout that the web is the only place you need to market and that direct mail doesn't work. In fact, I LOVE it when they feel that way. It means more business for us ;)
  • Christina,

    It's great to hear. Using offline methods to drive traffic to your site DOES pay off-- yet the big dogs like zillow and redfin just don't get it.

    Thank you for your proof-in-the-pudding comment.
  • Articles like this one & the link I've included below are very applicable/pertinent to what Realtors are trying to do & where they are spending their marketing dollars. Especially some of the younger/newer Realtors who are trying to do all they can to get a web presence & regionally there may be more challenges. It also plays into how we all market ourselves when we are doing listing presentations & helping our Buyers search...hopefully using your own website!

    http://www.brokeragentnews.com/news/residential...

    I don't know if this is something that can be addressed since realtor.com is associated on a national level with NAR. It seems to me that they (realtor.com)could do a much better job at marketing their website & not attempting to hold us hostage by giving us an initial presence in a very limited manner & feeding us the perception that we "need" to buy into the enhanced realtor.com package. Even some relocation companies want proof that there's an enhanced realtor.com website - they need to get with the program too & realize that is not (necessarily) the best presence for listings.
  • Interesting read, Elizabeth. Here's a key point:

    To put the meaning of this real data in real terms, why would you want your prospect to have to find the real estate portal, and then find you? Why wouldn't you want the prospect to find you directly?

    ...The way to find you directly may be offline.
  • Thanks for sharing
  • Very interesting stats... I wonder how rapidly will this change. I mean five years ago we even didn't think to search for real estate online and now so many people do... Ok, maybe, that's not the first thing they do but still they search for homes in the Internet. When will Internet be so strong that no real estate manager will be able to neglect it?
blog comments powered by Disqus

Blog Widget by LinkWithin