I read a post by Kris Berg about experts and the challenge of communicating your expertise to prospective clients. Words may not be enough to convince consumers you are great. Proclaiming you’re the #1 agent or Top Producer and you’re likely to get a yawn and a click away. But what if you really are a top producing agent?
I have suggested that real estate experts should market like other experts market, including appearing on local TV news, print news, teaching, speaking, etc.
But I was wondering. Could there be a statistical basis for showing consumers your abilities? Other professionals use stats. Baseball players have batting averages, slugging percentages, on base percentage, etc. Quarterbacks have efficiency ratings. Basketball players have scoring averages. Why not a batting average or efficiency rating for real estate agents?
Let’s say you got 10 listings last year and sold none– your batting average is 0.00, sold 3 of them, you’re batting .300. Maybe the median price of your sales is greater than the median price of homes in your market— that would indicate you have a better slugging percentage— you’re the Babe Ruth of brokers. Maybe you sell homes faster than the average. Maybe 90% of your listings renew with you. Maybe you are good at moving the tough properties (fixers, etc). (You can still get into the Realtor Hall of Fame hitting a lot of singles.) You get the idea.
Perhaps someone can come up with a working model that won’t tick everyone off.

















