<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Great Video Debate Continues</title>
	<link>http://blog.sellsiusrealestate.com/real-estate-marketing/the-great-video-debate-continues/2007/12/21/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 07:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: sellsius</title>
		<link>http://blog.sellsiusrealestate.com/real-estate-marketing/the-great-video-debate-continues/2007/12/21/#comment-169848</link>
		<dc:creator>sellsius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 01:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.sellsiusrealestate.com/real-estate-marketing/the-great-video-debate-continues/2007/12/21/#comment-169848</guid>
		<description>Yes, I know it is not about listings (although you did edit in Deek's insightful comments which were listings related).  

That's why I used the examples of tutorials, video interviews with residents, client testimonials. Let's throw in neighborhood tours, shopping area tours, school tours, park tours, coverage of town events, agent profiles, local news events, interviews with local officials, etc, etc. 

I think you do the industry a great service by pointing it away from a focus on listings and toward more creative applications for video. 
You the man, man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I know it is not about listings (although you did edit in Deek&#8217;s insightful comments which were listings related).  </p>
<p>That&#8217;s why I used the examples of tutorials, video interviews with residents, client testimonials. Let&#8217;s throw in neighborhood tours, shopping area tours, school tours, park tours, coverage of town events, agent profiles, local news events, interviews with local officials, etc, etc. </p>
<p>I think you do the industry a great service by pointing it away from a focus on listings and toward more creative applications for video.<br />
You the man, man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Turner</title>
		<link>http://blog.sellsiusrealestate.com/real-estate-marketing/the-great-video-debate-continues/2007/12/21/#comment-169819</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 23:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.sellsiusrealestate.com/real-estate-marketing/the-great-video-debate-continues/2007/12/21/#comment-169819</guid>
		<description>JF... when we're talking about showing people, I couldn't agree more. I've been saying this for a long time. This conversation is about videoblogging and podcasting, not listings. Again, I think that is a completely different conversation, with a great deal more complexity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JF&#8230; when we&#8217;re talking about showing people, I couldn&#8217;t agree more. I&#8217;ve been saying this for a long time. This conversation is about videoblogging and podcasting, not listings. Again, I think that is a completely different conversation, with a great deal more complexity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sellsius</title>
		<link>http://blog.sellsiusrealestate.com/real-estate-marketing/the-great-video-debate-continues/2007/12/21/#comment-169759</link>
		<dc:creator>sellsius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 20:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.sellsiusrealestate.com/real-estate-marketing/the-great-video-debate-continues/2007/12/21/#comment-169759</guid>
		<description>Obeoman,

People's buying habits change.  I no longer buy 8-tracks, records, cassette tapes, cds.  To make a political analogy-- the guy who wins the election in a landslide may, 4 years later, be shown the door.

Here's an example how video helped me make a consumer choice.  I wanted to go on a sailing trip in Maine.  One company sent me a brochure, the other a video.  The video conveyed the potential experience better for me. It sold me.

But you are right-- it must produce results.  And once it does, it gathers momentum and becomes a wave. I get the feeling, we'll soon be yelling "Surf's up".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obeoman,</p>
<p>People&#8217;s buying habits change.  I no longer buy 8-tracks, records, cassette tapes, cds.  To make a political analogy&#8211; the guy who wins the election in a landslide may, 4 years later, be shown the door.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s an example how video helped me make a consumer choice.  I wanted to go on a sailing trip in Maine.  One company sent me a brochure, the other a video.  The video conveyed the potential experience better for me. It sold me.</p>
<p>But you are right&#8211; it must produce results.  And once it does, it gathers momentum and becomes a wave. I get the feeling, we&#8217;ll soon be yelling &#8220;Surf&#8217;s up&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sellsius</title>
		<link>http://blog.sellsiusrealestate.com/real-estate-marketing/the-great-video-debate-continues/2007/12/21/#comment-169756</link>
		<dc:creator>sellsius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 20:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.sellsiusrealestate.com/real-estate-marketing/the-great-video-debate-continues/2007/12/21/#comment-169756</guid>
		<description>You did a fantastic job, Jeff.

You have shown, through your own use of video (here and elsewhere), that it certainly has a place at the table for real estate.  One example I've seen you use to great effect is the tutorial. (Brian Clark also used it in his Tubetorials, if you recall).

The conversational montage here would seem to have application to client testimonials or for interviews with people who live in the neighborhood to tell viewers/clients why they love the area.  

The fact that video more closely approximates reality makes it a more sensual medium.  And isn;t that useful to those wishing to convey an experience, which real estate is, for the most part.  Heck, if you could put a virtual mask on me and transport me to the house to look around and "feel it", I'd do it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You did a fantastic job, Jeff.</p>
<p>You have shown, through your own use of video (here and elsewhere), that it certainly has a place at the table for real estate.  One example I&#8217;ve seen you use to great effect is the tutorial. (Brian Clark also used it in his Tubetorials, if you recall).</p>
<p>The conversational montage here would seem to have application to client testimonials or for interviews with people who live in the neighborhood to tell viewers/clients why they love the area.  </p>
<p>The fact that video more closely approximates reality makes it a more sensual medium.  And isn;t that useful to those wishing to convey an experience, which real estate is, for the most part.  Heck, if you could put a virtual mask on me and transport me to the house to look around and &#8220;feel it&#8221;, I&#8217;d do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Turner</title>
		<link>http://blog.sellsiusrealestate.com/real-estate-marketing/the-great-video-debate-continues/2007/12/21/#comment-169716</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 18:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.sellsiusrealestate.com/real-estate-marketing/the-great-video-debate-continues/2007/12/21/#comment-169716</guid>
		<description>JF, a great synopsis, thank you. After the hours of editing, I was simply too exhausted to do the same! Seriously, this was a pain in the butt to produce. (The bad.)

To clarify, this was about videoblogging and podcasting, not listing videos. That is a whole different discussion.

Let's hope this video does advance the discussion. That was the goal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JF, a great synopsis, thank you. After the hours of editing, I was simply too exhausted to do the same! Seriously, this was a pain in the butt to produce. (The bad.)</p>
<p>To clarify, this was about videoblogging and podcasting, not listing videos. That is a whole different discussion.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s hope this video does advance the discussion. That was the goal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obeoman</title>
		<link>http://blog.sellsiusrealestate.com/real-estate-marketing/the-great-video-debate-continues/2007/12/21/#comment-169714</link>
		<dc:creator>Obeoman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 18:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.sellsiusrealestate.com/real-estate-marketing/the-great-video-debate-continues/2007/12/21/#comment-169714</guid>
		<description>Real Estate Consumers-Realtors, buyers, sellers-have already voted with their dollars.

Consumers have chosen Viritual Tours/Immersive Photography-coupled with still photos, effective aggregation, distribution and easily measured results- as the leading form of marketing propreties on line. All over the world.

In watching Jeffs' presentation, everyone was fair and unflinching in their evaluation of RE web video. 

Also, the current accepted model of downward pressure on pricing for web content creation does not support RE web video at all.

RE web video has a long way to go: in terms of quality, ease of use, distribution,agreggation and effectively measured results in terms of its practical use. Recently, several video sites announced they were no longe accepting user generated content.

Consumers run from a bad buying experience; it could be logically said the the vast majority of RE web video is not a good consumer experience.

I have always held that RE web video has a niche market: for imparting a sense of place, exceptional architecture or location and possibly for promoting a particularily dynamic Realtor or agency.

Obeoman
steven.stearns@obeo.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Real Estate Consumers-Realtors, buyers, sellers-have already voted with their dollars.</p>
<p>Consumers have chosen Viritual Tours/Immersive Photography-coupled with still photos, effective aggregation, distribution and easily measured results- as the leading form of marketing propreties on line. All over the world.</p>
<p>In watching Jeffs&#8217; presentation, everyone was fair and unflinching in their evaluation of RE web video. </p>
<p>Also, the current accepted model of downward pressure on pricing for web content creation does not support RE web video at all.</p>
<p>RE web video has a long way to go: in terms of quality, ease of use, distribution,agreggation and effectively measured results in terms of its practical use. Recently, several video sites announced they were no longe accepting user generated content.</p>
<p>Consumers run from a bad buying experience; it could be logically said the the vast majority of RE web video is not a good consumer experience.</p>
<p>I have always held that RE web video has a niche market: for imparting a sense of place, exceptional architecture or location and possibly for promoting a particularily dynamic Realtor or agency.</p>
<p>Obeoman<br />
<a href="mailto:steven.stearns@obeo.com">steven.stearns@obeo.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Thomas Di Giulio</title>
		<link>http://blog.sellsiusrealestate.com/real-estate-marketing/the-great-video-debate-continues/2007/12/21/#comment-169522</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Thomas Di Giulio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 05:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.sellsiusrealestate.com/real-estate-marketing/the-great-video-debate-continues/2007/12/21/#comment-169522</guid>
		<description>1. Kudos to Jeff for putting together a fine piece of video.

2. That said, none of our opinions matter. It's the consumer that decides this one. Yes of course we should discuss the pros and cons of each medium (especially when our business models are directly tied to either it's success or failure) but again, THE CONSUMER DECIDES THIS ONE.

3. Video just another tool? No proven advantage over traditional marketing? Your absolutely right. And the TV was just another way to communicate. Look... it's very easy to say that video is simply another tool, that it's not proven. It's too new, too difficult, too [pick an adjective]. While video online might be (somewhat) new, the medium itself is not. We all grew up on TV (video). The only difference is that now you, me, anyone can do it. Just like the people in Jeff's video, we can broadcast. We can reach out. We can communicate.

I'll take the good, the bad and the ugly. It's what makes us human.

Happy holidays everyone!

BTW... If you are wondering what some of the common objections to video might be? Check out this four part series, "&lt;a href="http://realestatevideo.wellcomemat.com/2007/10/16/objection-to-real-estate-video-4-video-is-only-good-in-certain-niche-scenarios/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Top Four Objections to Real Estate Video&lt;/a&gt;".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Kudos to Jeff for putting together a fine piece of video.</p>
<p>2. That said, none of our opinions matter. It&#8217;s the consumer that decides this one. Yes of course we should discuss the pros and cons of each medium (especially when our business models are directly tied to either it&#8217;s success or failure) but again, THE CONSUMER DECIDES THIS ONE.</p>
<p>3. Video just another tool? No proven advantage over traditional marketing? Your absolutely right. And the TV was just another way to communicate. Look&#8230; it&#8217;s very easy to say that video is simply another tool, that it&#8217;s not proven. It&#8217;s too new, too difficult, too [pick an adjective]. While video online might be (somewhat) new, the medium itself is not. We all grew up on TV (video). The only difference is that now you, me, anyone can do it. Just like the people in Jeff&#8217;s video, we can broadcast. We can reach out. We can communicate.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll take the good, the bad and the ugly. It&#8217;s what makes us human.</p>
<p>Happy holidays everyone!</p>
<p>BTW&#8230; If you are wondering what some of the common objections to video might be? Check out this four part series, &#8220;<a href="http://realestatevideo.wellcomemat.com/2007/10/16/objection-to-real-estate-video-4-video-is-only-good-in-certain-niche-scenarios/" >Top Four Objections to Real Estate Video</a>&#8220;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teresa Boardman</title>
		<link>http://blog.sellsiusrealestate.com/real-estate-marketing/the-great-video-debate-continues/2007/12/21/#comment-169385</link>
		<dc:creator>Teresa Boardman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 20:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.sellsiusrealestate.com/real-estate-marketing/the-great-video-debate-continues/2007/12/21/#comment-169385</guid>
		<description>My feelings on the black and white videos go right back to your last post. As for videos, they do have a place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My feelings on the black and white videos go right back to your last post. As for videos, they do have a place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
