A new study by economists at Northwestern University, The Relative Performance of Real Estate Marketing Platforms: MLS versus FSBOMadison.com, showed for-sale-by-owner (FSBO) sales, on average, netted owners more money than sales using a real estate agent and the local MLS, even with the commission factored in. However, the study also showed the FSBO homes took longer to sell (duh). The study covered actual transactions from 1998 to 2004 in Madison, Wisconsin, coincidentally the home of FSBO heaven website FSBOMadison.com, which has the news on its home page. The real estate sales data was taken from the MLS and the city assessor’s database of closed sales.
This evidence flies in the face of the much ballyhooed NAR Home Buyer & Seller Survey from 2005 that claimed sellers who used a real estate agent netted 16% higher sales prices than those that sold without an agent. Now which is the truth—-study or survey? Does it have anything to do with Madison, Wisconsin and FSBOMadison.com? You decide. Then tell us.
Other interesting findings and implications:
- 20% of the overall market was FSBO
- moving from FSBO to MLS adds 68 days on market
- houses initially listed on MLS sell faster
- less exposure of FSBO houses to buyer pool was a factor in the delay in sale
- patient sellers with liquid, easy to sell, properties favor the FSBO platform (impatient ones prefer MLS)
- patient sellers try to connect with smaller buyer pool in FSBO platform before moving to MLS and larger pool of buyers
- FSBO platform provides a cheaper way to explore a subset of buyers for an offer
- 87% of FSBO properties eventually sold, 95% on the FBSO platform
- Rarely did a MLS go FSBO
- FSBO success varied by neighborhood
- the premium to FSBOs after statistical adjustments was 4%, on average
- FSBOs that switched to MLS commanded a significant premium & were more likely to sell
- FSBO listings were less likely to sell between 60-90 days
- FSBOs who are real estate agents get higher prices
- there was no statistical difference when the time frame was 180 days
- authors of study admit to findings limited to the market studied
Source: New York Times, June 8, 2007 (article by Jeff Bailey)















