Zillow To Put Virtual Sold Signs on Homeowners Virtual Lawns


Imagine you just bought a home and the real estate agent who sold it told you he was keeping his sold sign on your lawn indefinitely. He says it’s good for his business. You’d like that wouldn’t you? Well, at Zillow.com that is exactly what will happen on your Zillow listed home with the launch of Virtual Sold Signs (VSS)— Zillow will let a broker keep a virtual sold sign on your virtual lawn INDEFINITELY. Send Zillow a nice thank you note here.

Here’s the announcement from their Zillow blog:

We’re also announcing an entirely new concept for brokerages, something we call our Virtual Sold Sign program (VSS). The concept is simple: imagine if as an agent or brokerage you could hang a “sold” sign on every home you’ve sold in a neighborhood — and keep it there long after the transaction is done. With VSS, brokerages with listings feeds can choose to have their branding and the agent’s contact information live on the Zillow Home details page of sold homes [and] Zillow map-based searches (Emphasis added)

Zillow co-Founder and CEO Rich Barton said in the Zillow press release, “Imagine having a permanent “sold by” sign in front of every home a brokerage has ever sold– giving buyers and sellers a critical piece of information on who is selling homes in the neighborhood– today and over time.” (emphasis added)

Yeah, imagine that.

Now, some agents may rejoice at this marketing opportunity– a “smokin’ thing”, one might say. But, as a new homeowner, I might be smokin’ mad about this virtual trespass for advertising. Once again, Zillow finds another way to do something online which they could never do offline without the homeowner’s consent. Don’t fret, it’s all in the name of transparency capitalism.

And what about the buyer’s broker?  If we understand the program, only listing brokers giving feeds get the benefit of VSS.   Why should the buyer’s broker be left out of the Virtual Sold Sign equation? They do as much (sometimes more) to sell the home as the listing broker.  The answer is Zillow wants the listing agent feeds and gives them the carrot– the buyers’ brokers get the stick.

So now the question becomes, will Zillow.com let the new homeowner opt-out of the Virtual Sold Sign program? Our crystal ball says NO WAY.

Related Posts:

Owners in Zillowland, We Want Out, Zestimates Removed

Is Zillow Using Our Homes As Bait?

Unzestimate My Home: Will Zillow Let Owners Opt- Out? (no!)

For the most complete Zillow coverage in the blogiverse see our table of contents under Zillow.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

Share This Post
  • I don't think I can agree with your virtual trespass analogy. An RE Agent's sign is placed on private property. This virtual sold sign is placed on an aggregate of public information.

    I guess I wouldn't decide if this is a good idea or not until I saw it implemented. I think it's useful to know who's the dominant lister in a particular area, so I guess I don't really see a problem.
  • I'm over Zillow.

    Zillow is going to change real estate-Hype
    Zestimates are going to replace Realtors-Hype
    Make me Move-Hype
    Zillow Ads-More Hype
    Zillow Q&A -more Hype
    Zillow Virtual SOld Signs-Even more hype

    When is the hype going to end?

    Zillow and Trulia are like the Facebook and Myspace for the Real Estate world, except noone is really hanging out in the social real estate world. Zillow want's to be but will never be a social network for real estate. To be that, it has to be open source. Open source is allowing other people to guide, direct and have say in your online community. Sellsius has already let us know that Zillow doesn't exactly do that.
  • Point taken Todd. That's why we called it a "virtual trespass"

    And by "virtual trespass" we mean without homeowner consent to it appearing on zillow.com.

    I think there is an implied consent by the home seller that the listing broker can advertise they sold the home, at least for some period of time -- the sold sign on the lawn-- and that consent probably extends also to the broker's website. But the question we pose is-- does that consent extend to third party aggregators who are using it to generate ad income for themselves. Our opinion is no, it does not. And we also have the question of the new homeowner-- does he or she give consent to the sold sign on the home which is no longer a listing?

    The thornier question is whether the details of the home sale-- the broker name and contact info -- are part of the public record. If they are, our position is harder to defend & we would probably concede it to Zillow but argue in that case, the buyer agent should also be listed.
  • Who should be listed? Buyer's agent or Listing Agent?

    Whomever pays more.
  • Good viral question. It seems to me that both parties listing and selling should be listed if one is going to do a virtual sold sign...one can't do it without the other...it takes 2!
  • Gena--

    Yes, we agree. Someone tell David G. He doesn't listen to us :)
  • Very nice.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Blog Widget by LinkWithin